DMIT

The Dermatoglyphics multiple intelligence Test (DMIT) Critically assesses the inherent acumen and aptitude of the individual and attempts to map the different creative and cognitive processes within the brain. While most other tests offer, at best, only a static result of a given performance at any time the dermatoglyphics multiple intelligence Test (DMIT) continually maps the development and growth of talent along an educational gradient.

What it factors in within its scope is not just the potential and scope for an existing skill set to improve within a person, but also the possibilities for an individual to acquire a new skill set or talent. So, while an IQ test for a child is restricted to only cognitive reasoning (for example, how good or bad he might be in mathematics at one given standard), the Dermatoglyphics multiple intelligence Test (DMIT) showcases multiple facets and applications of memory-based learning, reasoning, decision-making and even creativity. The Dermatoglyphics multiple intelligence Test (DMIT) is based on Dr Howard Gardner’s theory of multiple intelligences, which offers a solid, scientific explanation to the benefits of differential, application-oriented learning.

In real-world academics, dermatoglyphics multiple intelligence Test (DMIT) helps individuals augment their already-exiting skill sets and make for an enhanced learning experience. For example, if a learner has problems with mathematical formulas, Dermatoglyphics multiple intelligence Test (DMIT) could suggest different learning modules based on his/her existing talent and natural skill set.

A Research & Development and Laurels in the Field of Dermatoglyphics count): As to the finger ridge counting towards the RC ability to distinguish the study method of inborn intelligence, but the element of the post analysing was too simple.

1943 in the year of 1943, the middle 20 century, Dr Harold Cummins stated the theory PI (Pattern intensity) rate measuring, counting on RC value,3 delta areas value, forms the fingerprint added with potency value, then different finger pattern with its different position, also could produce different degree. The former using PI value is more accurate compared with the first method that only used RC measurement

1986=in 1986 Noble prize in physiology Was awarded to Dr Rita Levi-Montalcini Dr Stanley Cohen for discovering the correlation 1980 in the year 1880, early century of 19, Dr Henry Faulds stated the theory of finger RC (Ridge between NGF (Nerve Growth Factor) and EGF (Epidermal Growth factor).